The room that’s not for *all* women

Presumably along with most feminists, I was delighted when The Women’s Room was launched. For those who don’t know, The Women’s Room (TWR) aims to address the under-representation of women in the media by providing a database where females can sign up to be listed under their respective fields of expertise. The idea is that this increases their profile and brings them to the attention of the people who might be looking to hire, such as the BBC or any other media outlet.

So far, so good. In fact, so impressed was I with the ethos and aims of TWR that when they called out for volunteers to tweet from their Twitter account, I offered my services. Their volunteers work in shifts – morning, afternoon and evening – and I figured I could do a couple of mornings a week. I was told that tweeting from TWR account entailed responding to queries via tweet, and tweeting out to raise awareness of TWR. As a semi-literate person I thought I could manage that ok.

As it transpired, TWR thought differently. After being given the brush-off for a time whilst nobody seemed to be available to respond to my messages, I was told that my services were not required – yet, I saw they were still asking on Twitter (with some urgency, it has to be said) – for volunteers. I was confused. They needed volunteers; I was offering. What was the problem?

The problem, I was told, was that they were concerned for my safety if I was to tweet from TWR account. As a known radical feminist, I was told, whatever I tweeted would be overwhelmed by people attacking me for transphobia. TWR didn’t want to put me in that position, I was told, and nor were they willing to jeopardise the work TWR has done so far.

It’s quite possible at this point that you’ll be wondering whether TWR’s fears were justified. I am considered by some to be transphobic. This is apparently due to the fact that I strongly believe women-born-women have the right to female-only spaces, that I believe girlhood to be significant, and that I believe gender to be a social and cultural construct. I believe biological sex cannot be changed and that gender roles constrict us all.¬† I have never said that I wish any individual transperson, or transgender people generally, any harm. I have never said I wish anybody to die (despite having had death threats myself). I have never said that transgender people deserve to be treated with less respect than others, or that I consider transgender people to be of less value than any other human being. I have never said any of this because I don’t believe any of this. I suppose it all depends on your interpretation of ‘transphobia’.

Consider this: TWR welcomes Рand has always welcomed Рtranswomen. Its database of experts includes transwomen as well as born-women. I have personally witnessed tweets asking transwomen to volunteer to manage their Twitter account.  Not one radical feminist of which I am aware has objected to any of this Рeither to the inclusion of transwomen on the database of experts, or to transwomen tweeting from TWR account. I posit that this is because radical feminists do not wish to adversely affect the existence of such a valuable, feminist resource as TWR. We need more women in the media. It is shameful that we make up 50% of the population yet are still not seeing this reflected in the media (as, of course, in many other aspects of life). What I mean to say is that *true* feminists put the needs of the whole before our own individual feelings. This is what it means to be a feminist.

I wish TWR every success and I am sure it will flourish. The women on its database should be recognised for their expertise and not overlooked because they are women. That we actually need such a resource is shameful. That radical feminists are not ‘accepted’ in TWR is a blow and gives the title of the project an ironic twist. We should stand up to patriarchal bullies, not let them dictate to us what we can and can’t do – after all, isn’t that precisely what feminists are fighting against?



  1. Like you, I was also pleased when TWR was created. It’s unfortunate that its definition of “woman” doesn’t include radical feminists.
    Far from righting the imbalances of the media, it will only add to them by denying radfems a platform. The mainstream media already marginalizes, misquotes and stigmatizes us; TWR’s policy will only aid and abet that process.

  2. I wholeheartedly agree. It’s a very unfortunate policy and I actually think it undermines TWR, which is a shame.

  3. This is an amazing post. I agree 100%. ‘All women’ cannot exclude Radical Feminists. Our voices are the most marginalised in feminism. Our analysis of oppression is the most challenging to the patriarchy so we are consistently misrepresented to discredit what we say. By excluding us the Women’s Room are contributing to this silencing, endorsing a hierarchy of women’s voices that excludes the minority, perpetuating prejudice within feminism and kowtowing to the patriarchy. It is extremely sad and disappointing.

  4. Silencing dissent in a conversation that challenges the male-dominant status quo is a trick of patriarchy. They are clearly playing right along with patriarchy.

    It is heartbreaking that yet another women’s organization is silencing women-born-women for nothing more than offering a critique of the very cultural construct that oppresses women. Actually it’s shameful.

    1. Thank you for commenting. I completely agree with all you say.

  5. Anonamous · · Reply

    This is yet another example of bullying tactics winning over yet another organisation at the expense of its all-round integrity.

    1. Thanks for your comment. Yes, it is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: